Thursday, April 30, 2009

Welcome to Tromaville


Working under the slogan of “Movies of The Future,” Troma Entertainment, founded by Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz, has been producing and distributing low-budget films since 1974. One of the longest surviving American independent film studios, it has been a catalyst of do-it-yourself guerrilla filmmaking that has created the trademark “Troma Library.” There are essentially two types of Troma films, those produced, and those purchased, which make up the smorgasbord of psychopathic and surreal movies within the library. The trashy aesthetic and genre mutation (and character mutants) are what identify a Troma release, which boast such provocatively titled films like, Rabid Grannies (1988), Killer Condom (1997), Surf Nazis Must Die (1987) and the beloved Cannibal: The Musical (1996), the first film project for South Park creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone.

The films that have been the most commercially successful and revered by followers of the studio have been Troma’s own productions, Sgt. Kabukiman N.Y.P.D. (1993), Tromeo and Juliet (1996) and in particular, The Toxic Avenger series (1984-2001 [four parts]). The Toxic Avenger, also known as Toxie, is a fighter of crime, a mutant superhero, who employs excessive violence to defeat evil and restore community harmony. The films effectively establish the transparent values of the Troma ‘Universe’, which long time producer and director of the original Little Shop of Horrors (1960), Roger Corman, once described as “extreme yet idealistic, violent, yet romantic.”

The studio first established itself with sex comedies in the late 70s, and then after the success of the first Toxic Avenger (1984) Troma moved toward making films packed full of nudity, gore, and comic book violence. What has subsequently categorized Troma as a neo-independent studio is the various ways in which they have attempted to market a body of films which are practically all discredited by critics. The films are counter-aesthetic and are in full opposition to the institutions of Hollywood interest and popular taste.

The Toxic Avenger series is best described as a jumble of Peter Jackson’s style of slapstick horror, the absurdity of South Park, the physical comedy of the Three Stooges, the inventive murders of 1980 slasher films and the cheesy spoofing of film moments perfected by David Zucker in movies like Airplane! (1980).

Residing largely in isolation, main character, Toxie, always remains the friendly neighbor and a model citizen. His body might signify chemical pollution, but Toxie is still essentially law-abiding and clean-living. Within “Tromaville,” Toxie works with the blind, helps elderly folks cross the street, and even more mundanely helps a housewife open a tight jar lid. Tromaville’s streets and park are populated by the old and the young, illustrating community equality. Toxie can walk freely through Tromaville despite his gruesome appearance.

The citizens of Tromaville are repeatedly seen moving through the community, dancing in groups, enjoying leisure time walking dogs and taking picnics. Horse carriages are an optional and utmost optimal mode of transport, and well-behaved children bike and play in the streets free from passing traffic, all the while eating an endless supply of ice cream. But industrial capitalism, political greed, corporate, and gangs constantly threaten Tromaville’s utopia. Such counter-communitarian behavior challenges the moral rights of the community and puts Toxie in charge of saving the neighborhood.

The common silly and rude nature of Troma’s own productions disguises the extent of its social and political philosophies, and of those within Tromaville, the fictitious community built with the values of the studio. It is crazy that an independent producer of low-budget exploitation films should incorporate such ideologies into its productions. Troma’s communitarian logic is, however, not without its complications. Toxie’s acts of violence are part of his fight for community justice, yet they are clearly unethical, and contradicting of communitarian values, which have lead many critics to challenging the studio’s cultural worth. While Troma’s form of commentary is far from complete, it is not without moments of irony and eccentric oddity.


Troma fights the big pictures!!!
VERY GRAPHIC


Thursday, April 23, 2009

Marty

Uncompromisingly, Martin Scorsese is arguably the most brilliant filmmaker working in American film today. Over the past 40 years, Scorsese has directed an impressive canon of innovative and controversial independent (and big budget) films that clearly stand as some of the best Indies/films of all time, and at the time of their release thru to the present have clearly laid the groundwork for succeeding filmmakers. He combines a film enthusiast’s passion for film noir with an appreciation of rich characterization and a hint of place and time. Scorsese’s impressive, and yet erratic, career has been emulated by young indie directors. His intoxicating take of the film medium is most apparent in the work of Quentin Tarantino (Reservoir Dogs), Nick Gomez (The Sopranos), and Paul Thomas Anderson (There Will Be Blood).

Scorsese’s films display such talent with their dazzling camera work, jump cuts, and vivid framing that the filmmaking alone becomes a subject of his movies. His style is marked by a restless, jittery camera that in his best films reflect the tension of city life, a topic that found the most expression in Taxi Driver (1976).

An epic street opera, Taxi Driver centers on Travis Bickle (Robert Dinero), a Vietnam vet turned psychotic vigilante fighting against New York city’s scum, pimps, muggers, junkies and of course, politicians. The film generated controversy because of its bloody finale which was a long sequence of carnage involving a 12 year-old prostitute played by a young Jodi Foster.

In Scorsese’s next film and arguably finest film, Raging Bull (1980), he chose black-and-white cinematography to lend barren realism and intensity to the story of boxing champion, Jake La Motta, who rose from the dirt to the height of boxing, only to be destroyed by his own paranoia and personal vices.

Scorsese’s films are rooted in his Italian-American Catholic upbringing and confront themes of sin, guilt and justice. His explorations of male camaraderie, violent behavior, and definitely man’s deep fear of women have left significant footprints on the works of many directors. Scorsese places certain women, like mothers, on a pedestal to be revered, but more women in his films are depicted as being deceitful whores. Prostitutes are abound in Taxi Driver, and in Raging Bull, La Motta asks his brother to keep an eye on his wife for him, implying that given the chance, all women cheat on their husbands.

Based in New York, Scorsese has largely worked outside the establishment, pursuing his own path, (though often with Hollywood money) by making personal movies such as The Last Temptation of Christ. Scorsese has attained a goal of authorship more fully than other directors because of his high artistic quality. He may be one of the few directors left who still passionately cares about film.

Remember that Controversial scene in Taxi Driver I mentioned?
BOO-YA!!!



Unofficial Website of Martin Scorsese

Thursday, April 16, 2009

The Indie King Makes Movies Too!!!


A serio-comedy about a do-well barfly, “Indie King” Steve Buscemi’s, Trees Lounge (1997), is an apologetic look at the petty feuds and uneventful existence of working-class people in a New York suburb. The film’s greatest virtue is Buscemi’s thorough knowledge of the characters because of the autobiographical nature of the story. Trees Lounge is a projection of what life might have been had Buscemi never left Valley Stream, Long Island, to pursue an acting career.

At age 31, Tommy (Buscemi) is a loser who is described by his own friends as a screw-up. Tommy is fired from his job as an auto mechanic after “borrowing” money without informing his boss. Tommy’s former girlfriend, who may or may not be pregnant with his child, has moved in with his angry former boss. Living in a tiny apartment above a bar, Tommy has no money to fix his car or to buy drinks. Further complicating life is Debbie, an adolescent with a crush on Tommy. Temptation overcomes Tommy, and after an ill-advised night together Debbie’s hotheaded father is infuriated.

Epitomizing the middle-class locale is the neighborhood bar, Trees Lounge, in which neither the décor nor the jukebox songs have changed in years. Spending his time hustling drinks and engaging in one-night stands, Tommy gets kicked out of the place for bad behavior. At a crossroads in the film, Tommy realizes that he is young enough to break out and make something of his life. If he doesn’t, he can see his future down at the other end of the bar, where the old salty dog regular, Bill, drinks himself to death.

Neither the comic nor the melodramatic elements are punched up and over done. Buscemi roots his film in characterization and acting, with the humor stemming directly from the characters. Without forcing a dramatic structure or an obvious climax, Buscemi conveys the dead-end nature of aimless lives. He refrains from giving his film the self-conscious hipness typical of the indie pictures in which he has so often appeared just as an actor.

Buscemi handles the material with casualness, so his characters are not caught up in a big dramatic crisis, but instead they get engulfed with petty quarrels. Trees Lounge boasts a cast of indie staples like Samuel L. Jackson, Mimi Rogers and Chloe Sevingy. Above all it’s Buscemi’s triumph as an actor that makes Tommy both pathetic and sympathetic. In the film Buscemi successfully transfers his cheerless character and sensibility to a bar that is a cave for losers. Trees Lounge shows how the young and restless Tommy struggles to distinguish himself from the drinking community. Despite its grim subject, the film is rambunctious. The drinkers are funny, each one of them with an ego to defend, and the film serves as a testimonial of the valor of failure.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Avant-Garde Binge



Critics have argued that in Avant-Garde and post modern film there is an emphasis on style over substance, a consumption of images for their own sake rather than for their usefulness or the values they symbolize, a preoccupation with playfulness and inside jokes at the expense of meaning. Even in big Hollywood movies like Zach Snyder’s depiction of Alan Moore’s world renowned graphic novel, The Watchmen (2009), we see fashion over content. As a result qualities like integrity, coherence, seriousness, authenticity and intellectual depth are undermined. Indie films, as well as some Hollywood pictures have destabilized cinema from within by challenging audiences’ expectations of narrative and visual representation.

Avant-Garde director, Jon Jost, is a ruggedly independent filmmaker who unlike most of his contemporaries exhibits a voice that is uncompromisingly personal. Self-taught, Jost has made his films as cheaply as possible. Though he has been directing for over 30 years, only a few of his works have had theatrical releases.

In an article published in Film Comment Jost writes that he has always worked “small.” “My entire career has been mounted on a fiscal sum- less than $500,000- that in LA would scarcely be imagined suitable for an episode of a lame half-hour sitcom.” Jost later in his article writes, “The thought that there might be virtue in modesty, that having a crew of just two or three might actually have its benefits- and not merely fiscal- is perceived lunacy…is to point out the obvious and the tragic.” The obvious and the tragic being that big production, big money and big promotion have nothing to do with art or human values.

Jost’s movies are mostly about losers. The kind of protagonists considered unappealing by mainstream standards. His repertoire consists of three kinds of film according to film annalist, Emanuel Levy; essays, Westerns, and urbans. His essays include Speaking Directly: Some American Notes (1973), which deals with the intersection of the personal and the political of American involvement of the Vietnam War. Last Chance for a Slow Dance (1977), Slow Moves (1983) and Sure Fire (1988-1990) are among Jost’s Westerns. His westerns examine the teetering generation of cowboys after the frontier and the decline of honor at this time. The characters go on long drives through barren landscapes and the only emotion they have left is rage, which often results in violent and seemingly pointless deaths.

His urban films like All the Vermeer’s in New York (1992) incorporate the lyrical camera of Jost’s essays and the violence of his Westerns together, creating a poignant story of discrepancies between art and spiritual decay. Like all of Jost’s films, he explores the boundaries between narrative and experimental cinema. He presents worlds that are both beautiful and decadent, calm on the surface, but riddled with anxiety.

Like Jost, filmmaker David Lynch is dedicated to explaining the violent nature of American life, but unlike Jost, Lynch has the ability to transform scary nightmares into pleasurable sensations, like the infamous dinner scene from Lynch’s breakthrough film, Eraserhead (1977).


From the very beginning, viewers of a Lynch film expect to be shaken up, to be astonished by the tension, mood and sensation in his work. This is very likely the reason why the term “Lynchian” has become a catchphrase of all other cinematic deviations somewhat like his style. Lynch’s creativity manifests itself through a disconnected series of images and moods. “Cinema is a language that can say abstractions,” Lynch said in a June of 2007 lecture. In that lecture he explained that sometimes even he doesn’t know what’s going on in his films, but that “Intuition and knowingness” of the individual are all that matter. People can interpret things an infinite number of ways, and Lynch says that “You know for yourself what an idea in a films means, and what you know for yourself is valid.”

Thus is the gist of Avant-Garde independent film. A provocative thought or image that suggests nothing in life is fixed and that everything is relative. A surreal search beyond logic and beyond narrative of perversity, violence and frivolity.