Thursday, February 12, 2009

Viaduct Debate

this debate was quite similar to a case study I used for my paper regarding the implementing of bike lanes in San Francisco and the debate that arose amongst motorists and cyclists. I think that it is obvious that alternate modes of transportation need to be at the forefront of public conversation and construction. The tunnel would be an unfortunate addition to the city. the argument that Seattle was built for automobiles and that cars will always be around is bogus and circular. Traffic exists because of cars, without them there would be no traffic and far less pollution. 

Ride a bike! Save the world!

No comments: